Boring p24 - Catagolue

Boring p24 (xp24_co9nas0san9oczgoldlo0oldlogy0ggz1047210127401y01581qo)

#C [[ GRID THUMBLAUNCH THUMBSIZE 2 THEME Catagolue ]] 
x = 1, y = 1, rule = B3/S23
b!

	This pattern is an oscillator.
	This pattern is periodic with period 24.
	This pattern runs in a non-standard rule (b2i34ckqty5-k6-in78s234aceitwz5-acei6-e7).
	The population fluctuates between 62 and 98.
	This evolutionary sequence works in multiple rules, from b3-jkys23-ky through to b2i34ckqty5-k6-in78s234aceitwz5-acei6-e7.

Pattern RLE

Code: Select all

Sample occurrences

There are no sample soups stored in the Catagolue.

Comments (16)

Displaying comments 1 to 16.

On 2019-05-12 at 14:57:32 UTC, Someone wrote:

Less common than uninteresting in G1

On 2018-11-12 at 01:23:08 UTC, Someone wrote:

I guess that should explain the so-called ?generalization? of the RLE format for lifelib and it?s maximum of 2^64 states.

On 2018-11-12 at 01:19:38 UTC, Someone wrote:

That's actually true for lifelib!

On 2018-11-12 at 01:19:21 UTC, Someone wrote:

Another random post: For rules with more than two states, a "." represents a zero state; states 1..24 are represented by "A".."X", states 25..48 by "pA".."pX", states 49..72 by "qA".."qX", and on up to state 2^64-1 represented by "ptwzzzqrytvsyuqwprQ".

On 2018-11-09 at 01:49:48 UTC, Someone wrote:

This version is much more boring: https://catagolue.appspot.com/object/boring%20p24/b3s23

On 2018-11-09 at 01:46:22 UTC, Someone wrote:

Random post: Despite being composed of two oscillators of smaller period (7368408 and 2017384 respectively), it is considered non-trivial because it has one cell that is alive in one generation and dead in the other 1858113550583.

On 2017-09-14 at 23:08:57 UTC, sul0002@wembleyps.vic.edu.au wrote:

The pink one has 8... wow

On 2017-06-14 at 11:26:47 UTC, ilovecoding23 wrote:

It's not boring. The fact that a pulsar can avoid being destroyed by this figure eight (Pulsars are fragile!) is AMAZING! And the way that the domino is bounced back and forth, too.

On 2017-01-27 at 03:27:57 UTC, Someone wrote:

sup bois

On 2016-06-16 at 15:12:16 UTC, Someone wrote:

One in D2_+2!

On 2015-12-06 at 16:25:49 UTC, apgoucher@gmx.com wrote:

Fourth. It's starting to become unusual that the other isomer has yet to appear.

On 2015-10-20 at 13:39:08 UTC, Someone wrote:

Third!

On 2015-09-27 at 18:40:46 UTC, galen@cholbi.com wrote:

It is quite boring, but perhaps a more appropriate name might be "Trans-figure eight on Pulsar"? Or "Trans-boring p24"?

On 2015-09-25 at 19:24:54 UTC, Someone wrote:

Haha, I love the new name.

On 2015-09-19 at 20:26:03 UTC, Someone wrote:

Another one..

On 2015-09-18 at 17:14:36 UTC, Someone wrote:

Two??????

Please log in to post comments.